Cherry Picker
Forum Supporter
Just my opinion, but I have yet to see any detector that can have multiple targets under the coil and still have an accurate VDI. Heck, they are lucky to get just one right LOL.
As I said, when coins are stacked on top of one another, no, you can never ever separate them. Always a blended response. But if the coins are separated, they can appear under the coil "at the same time" (say, 2 coins 2" apart as a 10" coil sweeps over) and the detector can distinguish them. The ID you get for each depends on a lot of factors. The actual distance between the coins, their depths, their independent IDs, the speed of the detector's filters, size of the coil, for examples. Distance and depth are biggies, as 2 coins spaced 2" apart may be somewhat easy to pick apart if they are really shallow, but as they get deeper the signals will blend more. It's a geometry problem. If those coins are a nickel and a quarter then you are more likely to see 2 distinct ID blocks than if they are a cent and a dime. Even then, the nickel ID is likely to be pulled up by the quarter, and the quarter ID pulled down by the nickel. The point is, a number of detectors have the ability to indicate that you just swept over 2 very close targets. It's not perfect and it's subject to a lot of factors that affect the IDs but, in the spirit of what the OP was asking, it's possible.A blended OR stronger signal. That makes sense. But, simultaneously with the correct ID block for each? For example, if a nickel and dime are distorting the field at the same time, can I get a proper ID blocks on the dime AND the nickel?
Yep. That was my point because of the blending.Just my opinion, but I have yet to see any detector that can have multiple targets under the coil and still have an accurate VDI. Heck, they are lucky to get just one right LOL.
By George your a genius!!Heres an idea, if it gives a nice clean signal, dig it, and check the hole for more targets
Well canslaw pull-tabs aluminum rivets and a host of other things give clean signals when hunting in human garbage I prefer not to go home with a pouch of garbage and a sore hand . subeHeres an idea, if it gives a nice clean signal, dig it, and check the hole for more targets
Where I hunt this is impossible. I even cringe when I have a coin spill and ultimately tear up my plug.Y'all make this way way way too complicated. Set your machine up and dig all positive hits, and when in doubt...dig it out!
I used to run an ETRAC and it was terrible about falseing on nails. I had to run the Ferrous pretty high to stop that.The Minelab E-Trac/CTX are the only detectors I've owned that could display more than one VDI. I used the ferrous (FE) more than I used the conductive (CO) in our city park. Why no one has pursued that option and improved on it is beyond me.
According to a new video that just came out, there may be more going on than that.Antics with microsemantics.
Yep. And you were the lead arguer.Yep. That was my point because of the blending.
Like Carl said, we're arguing semantics lol.
Yes but two targets displayed?Vdi combined for 2 targets not seperate on my vortex