Thanks for the info!I agree with what Hoser said about the Master Hunter. Also, if it ends up thatyou don't like it after using it awhile, you've got yourself a nice "collector's item".
Thanks Hoser, I think I'll go for it.I had the predecessor to that unit with the Master Hunter ADS7. It was a very good detector. I think the CXIII was a lot more sophisticated machine and I would say it was top of the line Garrett machine for several years. As long as it is in good shape and works well, then heck yeah it's worth $100.
Very little cost if you use rechargeable batteries.Unless you're nostalgic, then no, it's not worth $100. That thing will take a car battery to run, so don't forgot to add in battery cost
...and that's just 1 of the reasons why it's not worth $100, compared to the alternatives.
Get a second hand Bounty Hunter Tracker 4 for $50. Or, DR. Otek is a reputable company, and here's a new Dr. Otek digital detector for $120.
It takes 6 C type batteries!Very little cost if you use rechargeable batteries.
I wasn't aware that it used "C" types, but if they were used for 10 years of hunting, the battery cost would only be about 6-7 dollars per year. As far as other problems with the detector, that's another story and all possible problems would have to be considered before making the purchase.It takes 6 C type batteries!
What's that? About $50 to $70 dollars for the batteries and charger for a very old $100 detector? Plus, it's very heavy and probably has leaking and/or defective capacitors.
There's much better alternatives in the $100 range.
10 years? Do you really think a newbie is going to buy that 30 year old detector and use it for 10 years?I wasn't aware that it used "C" types, but if they were used for 10 years of hunting, the battery cost would only be about 6-7 dollars per year. As far as other problems with the detector, that's another story and all possible problems would have to be considered before making the purchase.
Yep! That's it. I found a lot of coins with it, a cheap ring, bullets etc. Good feedback!You can't go wrong with paying only $60 for that Gordon High detector. If you bought that old Garrett, it probably would have ended up in the closet.
This is the one you have, correct?
I never said the "newbie" WOULD use the detector for ten years. My comment was to say that IF someone got ten years out of the batteries the cost would be minimal.10 years? Do you really think a newbie is going to buy that 30 year old detector and use it for 10 years?
More like instant regret when the newbie buys it, and then finds out he could have got a much better alternative for cheaper.
Except we aren't discussing "someone". We're discussing Dan using 6 rechargeable C cells in a very old detector.I never said the "newbie" WOULD use the detector for ten years. My comment was to say that IF someone got ten years out of the batteries the cost would be minimal.
Doesn't matter if it's Dan or someone else. How do you know what he'd do? Sure...buy the cheap batteries to test it out and then.........if Dan likes it he could then lay out the money for rechargeables. You've got your opinion and I've got mine..........Except we aren't discussing "someone". We're discussing Dan using 6 rechargeable C cells in a very old detector.
Ideally, if he got the detector, he would just buy some cheap alkaline batteries to test it out. That way, he doesn't waste $50 to $70 for the rechargeables, on top of the detector cost, just to never use the detector again