You have me all wrong MD. I have not given up on this thread. I am just sitting back watching some of the bickering going on about who has the best machine. And who obviously has enough money to have multiple high dollar machines to compare their field data. I started with the Ace 150(gift) and went to the PRO. And I haven't considered giving up on it. I know it well but I still have plenty of room to learn it. I never thought this thread would get this argumentative about brands but I guess that comes with the territory like a Chevy/Ford/Dodge argument. My only intention of this post is why are my number readings so deceiving? And there are quite a few posts on here that I have read numerous times because of the relevance of the original question and I am taking those tips and suggestions to heart. As far as me destroying the pro, when I get back to that iron field that I cannot break through, I'm sure I will have the same conclusion. But put me in someones yard, and I will be glad that I made that choice to keep it.
Well, good for you. There is nothing, I repeat, nothing wrong with the AT Pro. It is a metal detector and finds metal. It's not magic. In the right hands, the AT Pro will command the ground effectively. And who ever tried to leave the Bounty Hunters behind, probably doesn't know much about metal metrics.
The AT Pro was built around the ACE design, so a new detectorist could put to use the simplicity of the ACE yet the more experienced could tap into the more sophisticated options that were available, ie the Pro mode. For it's price, the ATP has found as much as any detector and has made many detectorists satisfied with it's abilities.
I have buddies who laughed when I bought my BH LRP. I gave up my Fisher F5 for it that I used for 6+ years. After months of working with the LRP, I know it and it's abilities to command the ground. It uses the same process as the Teknetics and Fishers, and left the old 6.6 Khz design. My friends laugh no more as I keep up with their Whites, Garretts and Minelabs.
The best detector is the one that you meld with. Learn it. They all have EM fields that go many feet deep. Their abilities to detect are all close to the same. When you understand the metrics of detecting you realize that physics limits pie in the sky comments. If someone says his detector can get a quarter at 24" with an 8" coil, then he cannot see a quarter at 6" or 8". The simple physics won't allow it. Depth has never been a problem for engineers. But continuous ID from 1" to X" is limited by many factors, including coil size.
If there were a best detector, everyone would own it (or at least want it). I don't knock anyones view of whats best for them. But don't knock whats best for me. I'm not you. And if we hunt together, you might be surprised, as my buddies were.
Good luck and keep the faith.