$$$$ Would you return it?

I got started in metal detecting 4 1/2 years ago when I was 11 because I wanted to find treasure. I still hold to that view (though now its the best hobby ever) and if I found a $30,000 diamond ring I would sell it, because that be a nice start to my life and someone who is able to lose a 30K ring, does not need it back.
 
I got started in metal detecting 4 1/2 years ago when I was 11 because I wanted to find treasure. I still hold to that view (though now its the best hobby ever) and if I found a $30,000 diamond ring I would sell it, because that be a nice start to my life and someone who is able to lose a 30K ring, does not need it back.
…and they most likely got it insured anyway. Plus if there is no markings on the inside that would tell anything about the owner, then why return it if you do not know for sure who wore it in the first place…
 
Donneybrook;2037689someone who is able to lose a 30K ring said:
That is not necessarily true, Maybe that ring was inherited from a lost parent as just 1 example. That don't make the recipient automatically able to afford to lose anything. I know of many people that struggle in life but have wealthy parents.
Now lets use your wording of someone who is able to lose a 30K ring, does not need it back without even going into the issue of is turning it in the morally right thing to do, But instead i will ask you just because they can afford to lose it does that make it right to keep it? Would you give it back to a poor person in the same situation? Just wondering about your theory here as it kind of reminds me of penalizing the wealthy for being successful.
 
That is not necessarily true, Maybe that ring was inherited from a lost parent as just 1 example. That don't make the recipient automatically able to afford to lose anything. I know of many people that struggle in life but have wealthy parents.
Now lets use your wording of someone who is able to lose a 30K ring, does not need it back without even going into the issue of is turning it in the right thing to do, But instead i will ask you just because they can afford to lose it does that make it right to keep it? Would you give it back to a poor person in the same situation? Just wondering about your theory here as it kind of reminds me of penalizing the wealthy.

I'm going with your general scenario. Do you honestly believe a poor person is going to have a 30k diamond ring? And as Issac said, in most cases they would have been insured. I dont consider this to be an ethical issue. People realize we metal detectorists are in this to find treasure, so by golly that's what I'm gonna do!
 
I'm going with your general scenario. Do you honestly believe a poor person is going to have a 30k diamond ring? And as Issac said, in most cases they would have been insured. I dont consider this to be an ethical issue. People realize we metal detectorists are in this to find treasure, so by golly that's what I'm gonna do!

Yes there are many people that have inherited jewelry but that don't make them wealthy or as stated above it don't make them more able to afford to lose anything. As far as the insurance goes read my original post i asked to keep that out because we simply have no way of knowing whether it is insured or not which brings up another argument that i don't care to open up and that is then the item would be the property of the insurance company but lets don't even get that started.
Please note that my original post also included an example of a class ring that originally sold for a few hundred dollars just to keep this a universal situation.

You bring up the word ethical Do you know the true meaning?

eth·i·cal
adjective \ˈe-thi-kəl\

: involving questions of right and wrong behavior : relating to ethics

: following accepted rules of behavior : morally right and good

What you do with your finds is up to you but just remember how you feel when you lose something that means alot to you. If i remember correctly it wasn't long ago that somebody took a big part of a tree from your FAMILY property that obviously meant alot to you and you will never get it back, You were very shook up about it, Do you remember how it felt? Just food for thought.
 
A $100-$200 ring I have no problems returning, and I have, but if someone is willing to wear a $10,000-$30,000 ring to the beach they don't care about loosing it. I'd keep it.
 
Yes there are many people that have inherited jewelry but that don't make them wealthy or as stated above it don't make them more able to afford to lose anything. As far as the insurance goes read my original post i asked to keep that out because we simply have no way of knowing whether it is insured or not which brings up another argument that i don't care to open up and that is then the item would be the property of the insurance company but lets don't even get that started.

You bring up the word ethical Do you know the true meaning?

eth·i·cal
adjective \ˈe-thi-kəl\

: involving questions of right and wrong behavior : relating to ethics

: following accepted rules of behavior : morally right and good

What you do with your finds is up to you but just remember how you feel when you lose something that means alot to you. If i remember correctly it wasn't long ago that somebody took a big part of a tree that obviously meant alot to you and you will never get it back from your FAMILY property and you were very shook up about it. Just food for thought.

Here is another take on this:

Say you are some rich billionaire and you simply love to metal detect. You grab your MD and head down to the park in the ghetto cause you always find more stuff there. Bingo! You find this beautiful $30,000 ring.

What does rich dude do with it?
 
Here is another take on this:

Say you are some rich billionaire and you simply love to metal detect. You grab your MD and head down to the park in the ghetto cause you always find more stuff there. Bingo! You find this beautiful $30,000 ring.

What does rich dude do with it?

Anything that he chooses. My intent of the thread is to know what you or other detectorists would do.
 
If it was identifiable, I would return it. Might look on Craigslist or local paper for lost and found. If nothing there, I would go for the cash !!!
 
There may be circumstances under which i would try and return the ring but in most cases my thoughts are this. .....if i had not come by to find it the ring is as good as gone and may never be found. The ring could wind up sitting there for the rest of time realistically if i had not found it , the ring is gone.....not misplaced around the house or in a jacket pocket where it will turn up again , lost outdoors on public property for an undisclosed amount of time , the previous owner has accepted it and written it off. I saved it from its otherwise permanent resting spot so i decide who it belongs to and it may very well be me :lol:
 
"I live from pay check to pay check and if I found a ring or whatever that's been under ground and I dig it up and it's worth a lot of money damn right I'm gonna get paid! It's a dog eat dog world and this dog is hungry!"





Minelab CTX Dirty30-Teknetics T2 Se



Yet you have a 2500.00 machine. I live week to week myself. I'd still try hard to find the rightful owner.[/QUOTE]


My boss buys all of my gear, I have never paid a dime for my stuff


Minelab CTX Dirty30-Teknetics T2 Se
 
I'd like to think I'd make a good faith effort to find the owner and return it. I'd LIKE to think that, but the truth is I don't know what I'd do. It's a hypothetical situation, and I've never been presented with a choice like that before, so I don't know what I'd do. I think if i decided to keep it and saw a CL ad describing exactly the ring I found I'd have a hard time not returning it.

Honestly, I don't know. It's never likely to happen anyway.
 
I'd like to think I'd make a good faith effort to find the owner and return it. I'd LIKE to think that, but the truth is I don't know what I'd do. It's a hypothetical situation, and I've never been presented with a choice like that before, so I don't know what I'd do. I think if i decided to keep it and saw a CL ad describing exactly the ring I found I'd have a hard time not returning it.



Honestly, I don't know. It's never likely to happen anyway.


Best post so far. Not sure any if us can honestly say what we would do until we are actually faced with the situation.



Chris W.
 
For me detecting is just for fun. I like the finds, but it isn't solely about the cash value. It is kinda like fishing. I have many thousands of dollars wrapped up in fly fishing and fly tying stuff. I spend a fair amount of time and money traveling to fish. I do lots of research on fly patterns, fish habits, rivers and fishing gear. I have caught some amazing fish. I am a catch and release fisherman. Why do I bother fishing? Because for that moment that the fish is mine to keep or put back, I am just happy to be there. I could have saved all that money and sat home watching fishing shows, and bought all the fish I could eat.

I will sell some finds, keep some, and have returned a gold class ring. If the owner can be easily tracked down, I choose to return it. I am not going to make it my life's work to find the owner, but I will give it my honest effort.

Pretty much sums up my sentiment too. If it's identifiable I will try to return it, especially in the OP's fantastical "what if" scenario of finding a freshly-dropped, $30,000 ring...though I don't think that's going to happen any time soon. :D
 
Back
Top Bottom