Sure. It's past event, and current event, about a baseless suit.
Anyone can come up with a "string of suspicious events" (people with squinty eyes, mysterious lights seen in the distance, etc...) and those do not constitute "evidence of a treasure".
Example : I can come up with the same salacious story-line about aliens at Area 51. And say that : "Unless you can explain to me these 20 salacious suspicious things, to my satisfaction, then presto: There must be aliens at Area 51".
On the contrary, it's up to the claimant to prove aliens at area 51. So too is the same logic here : It's not up to skeptics to prove there ISN'T treasure. It's up to the believer to prove there IS treasure.
I can do the same footloose mind-games with things involving JFK assassination, chemtrails, 5g towers, etc.... And give you a "salacious list" of things to show that the Rothschilds and Rockefellers are trying to take over the world, blah blah
Dennis' complete line of reasoning is that if he can't get every person to dance to his drum, then that MUST mean : Vast Treasure.