The FBI Files: Dents Run Civil War Gold

[SS_Wonder]

Seems like he is transitioning from finding the long lost dents run gold ($1 BILLION) to having a cable tv show.

Parada’s story about a world wide ap press release looks to be just another of his fantasies.

 

[GoDeep]

He has to pivot to a new story. The Dents Run well is about to run dry....

 

[Tom_in_CA]

He has to pivot to a new story. The Dents Run well is about to run dry....

No. It's not about to "run dry". It's got :

1) proofs of coverup (lack of ability of authority figures to produce XYZ documents). That's not "dry" , is it ? And

2) It's got a potential TV show. That's not "dry", is it ?

C'mon Go-deep, you gotta get your word definitions correct ! And no, this has never been a "new story". It's been the "story" ALL ALONG.

 

[GoDeep]

No. It's not about to "run dry". It's got :

1) proofs of coverup (lack of ability of authority figures to produce XYZ documents). That's not "dry" , is it ? And

2) It's got a potential TV show. That's not "dry", is it ?

C'mon Go-deep, you gotta get your word definitions correct ! And no, this has never been a "new story". It's been the "story" ALL ALONG.

Agree to disagree. In my opinion, the well is running dry and the receipts are due on all the claims he's made over the years regarding Dents Run. He's on the pivot and already using his all too familiar phrases with his new claims, such as , a "major film crew" and "we'll have our own TV series" and "there's a lot to tell, but we can't tell just yet".

 

[SS_Wonder]

GoDeep is 100% correct.

Parada has realized that the world has moved on from his dent's run lies and he is looking for another storyline.

 

[SeabeeRon]

He's still at it.....

The government has asked for a 2-week extension to file their reply and opposition to our cross-motion. I have lost count on how many extensions they got this year, we have not asked for 1 extension. I guess they need more time to cover the mistakes they made. The AP has the story and the longer this stalls the better it gets. I just keep finding more and more things in the FBI Files that prove a Night Dig.

 

[Tpmetal]

His kind of behavior almost makes you want to try and match his media output by trying to get go deep on a tv show somewhere disproving him. I would watch a well put together documentary of going over the life and lies of Dennis. One of those shows that debunks myths and conspiracy theories

 

[Tom_in_CA]

..... the well is running dry ....

UUhhh, yes, the well is running dry for discerning logical minds like yours and rational persons-like-you. But for the general public, who are swoon by bleary eyed treasure-ghost-stories : No.

As logical as the "logic" is to critical thinkers like you and I, yet, I am amazed at how the casual viewer/reader to these "salacious stories", is drawn in by the swoon.

For example : One of my best md'ing buddies and I were on a multi-day travel-trek md'ing trip a few years ago, and ... the subject of Oak Island came up. And to my surprise, this buddy of mine (who I thought would be an intellectual skeptic like myself) was actually sympathetic to the story and claims. Eg.: "Gosh, there has to be something there, because of X, Y, Z factors". So I began, one-by-one, to disassemble the points (showing the more plausible explanations). BUT THE POINT BEING , is that : The general public (yes, even people you think should know better) are drawn in by the cliff-hanger-Hollywood presentations. Who can resist a good conspiracy ? Who can resist a good treasure story ?

And yes I know you think that Dennis knows full well this is all bullcr*p. But I still think that Dennis is equally hoodwinked. People actually do believe conspiracy nonsense, and are perfectly sincere in the process. And lest you think this is giving Dennis a free-pass green-light , I remind you that the net effect is that I'm essentially calling him "stupid". While you're essentially calling him a "liar". Neither label is that nice, eh ?

 

[Tom_in_CA]

His kind of behavior almost makes you want to try and match his media output by trying to get go deep on a tv show somewhere disproving him. I would watch a well put together documentary of going over the life and lies of Dennis. One of those shows that debunks myths and conspiracy theories

While there's no doubt that cliffhanger treasure and spook stories are what tends-to-sell in Hollywood, yet : There is also a demand for debunkers. Not as much unfortunately, but .... as an example, the dude "Amazing Randi" was quite in demand for his commentary and debunking efforts, when it came to paranormal stuff (psychics, etc....).

Thus : If Dennis ever gets his wishes, and this becomes the "next Oak Island" publicity, then yes : I hope that voices like Go-deep, get called upon, and interviewed, for the contrary push-back view. I realize there's no harm and no foul when/if people believe this D.R. nonsense (just like people believe O.I. and it's no sweat off our backs). But it's just that : This D.R. thing is a rare opportunity where it's current-events. Things where you can go to the "primary source documents" of the said-evolution.

Unlike O.I. and other such legends, where, when you go to ask "says who ?", you are merely pointed back to the legend itself (circular logic) . But in the case of this D.R. thing, we can FINALLY go to the source, and SEE how the psychology unfolds. And I'll bet you dollars to donuts, that so-too are all the legends of antiquity born the same way.

 

[SS_Wonder]

UUhhh, yes, the well is running dry for discerning logical minds like yours and rational persons-like-you. But for the general public, who are swoon by bleary eyed treasure-ghost-stories : No.

As logical as the "logic" is to critical thinkers like you and I, yet, I am amazed at how the casual viewer/reader to these "salacious stories", is drawn in by the swoon.

For example : One of my best md'ing buddies and I were on a multi-day travel-trek md'ing trip a few years ago, and ... the subject of Oak Island came up. And to my surprise, this buddy of mine (who I thought would be an intellectual skeptic like myself) was actually sympathetic to the story and claims. Eg.: "Gosh, there has to be something there, because of X, Y, Z factors". So I began, one-by-one, to disassemble the points (showing the more plausible explanations). BUT THE POINT BEING , is that : The general public (yes, even people you think should know better) are drawn in by the cliff-hanger-Hollywood presentations. Who can resist a good conspiracy ? Who can resist a good treasure story ?

And yes I know you think that Dennis knows full well this is all bullcr*p. But I still think that Dennis is equally hoodwinked. People actually do believe conspiracy nonsense, and are perfectly sincere in the process. And lest you think this is giving Dennis a free-pass green-light , I remind you that the net effect is that I'm essentially calling him "stupid". While you're essentially calling him a "liar". Neither label is that nice, eh ?

When parada claimed he found Templar graves and a Templar vault in Nova Scotia a few years back (of course without presenting any actual evidence), once the cable tv show fell thru he never mentioned it again.

Parada doesn't believe in his lies, he knows exactly what he is doing.

 

[SS_Wonder]

While there's no doubt that cliffhanger treasure and spook stories are what tends-to-sell in Hollywood, yet : There is also a demand for debunkers. Not as much unfortunately, but .... as an example, the dude "Amazing Randi" was quite in demand for his commentary and debunking efforts, when it came to paranormal stuff (psychics, etc....).

Thus : If Dennis ever gets his wishes, and this becomes the "next Oak Island" publicity, then yes : I hope that voices like Go-deep, get called upon, and interviewed, for the contrary push-back view. I realize there's no harm and no foul when/if people believe this D.R. nonsense (just like people believe O.I. and it's no sweat off our backs). But it's just that : This D.R. thing is a rare opportunity where it's current-events. Things where you can go to the "primary source documents" of the said-evolution.

Unlike O.I. and other such legends, where, when you go to ask "says who ?", you are merely pointed back to the legend itself (circular logic) . But in the case of this D.R. thing, we can FINALLY go to the source, and SEE how the psychology unfolds. And I'll bet you dollars to donuts, that so-too are all the legends of antiquity born the same way.

I'll donate to the, "GoDeep and Tom_in_CA Fantastical Treasure Claims Debunked" show on youtube.

 

[Tom_in_CA]

When parada claimed he found Templar graves and a Templar vault in Nova Scotia a few years back (of course without presenting any actual evidence), once the cable tv show fell thru he never mentioned it again.

Parada doesn't believe in his lies, he knows exactly what he is doing.

I'll bet you that Parada *does* believe there's Templar graves and Templar vaults in Nova Scotia. The fact that he dropped that yarn, and moved on to this D.R. yarn, doesn't mean he now disbelieves it.

As I say, someone very dear to me is very "taken in " by conspiracy theories. Eg.: JFK assassination, 9-11, chemtrails, 5g towers, vaccines, etc.... And : Just because this person "goes silent" on any of the particular yarns, doesn't mean they've wised up or changed their mind. Because I guarantee you that if I were to ask this person, a year later, about 5g towers (or whatever), they would pipe back up with the same yarn. And be very sincere about it.

So too do I bet that if you got Parada talking, he would not have budged an inch from his Nova Scotia yarn. And I bet he's being totally sincere.

But as said : What I'm essentially doing is calling him "stupid". And what you're essentially doing is calling him a "liar". Thus : Neither title is very flattering, eh ?

 

[Tom_in_CA]

I'll donate to the, "GoDeep and Tom_in_CA Fantastical Treasure Claims Debunked" show on youtube.

You got a deal. Kindly deposit $1,000 to my paypal, and I'll get right to work on it

But seriously now : In this day & age where people consume their news and commentaries via Youtube or google (no one buys newspapers or reads books these days), then : Yes, a Youtube video that ANSWERS these D.R. claims, would probably get hits.

How about it Go-deep ? If you're set up to do a zoom call, let's do it as an interview style. Ok ?

 

[SS_Wonder]

You got a deal. Kindly deposit $1,000 to my paypal, and I'll get right to work on it

But seriously now : In this day & age where people consume their news and commentaries via Youtube or google (no one buys newspapers or reads books these days), then : Yes, a Youtube video that ANSWERS these D.R. claims, would probably get hits.

How about it Go-deep ? If you're set up to do a zoom call, let's do it as an interview style. Ok ?

The irony for parada would be that you and GoDeep would probably be contacted by a cable TV channel to produce a show.

 

[GoDeep]

And yes I know you think that Dennis knows full well this is all bullcr*p. But I still think that Dennis is equally hoodwinked. People actually do believe conspiracy nonsense, and are perfectly sincere in the process. And lest you think this is giving Dennis a free-pass green-light , I remind you that the net effect is that I'm essentially calling him "stupid". While you're essentially calling him a "liar". Neither label is that nice, eh ?

They aren't mutually exclusive; he can be a liar and still "believe"...Yes, he may believe there was gold there, but it's clear he also allows that there wasn't gold there and has thus made up significant lies to keep the story alive and intentionally concealed and ignored evidence that supports no gold having been found.

When i say the "well is running dry", it has nothing to do with Dennis, he'll believe what he believes until he dies and I'm not fixated on what his true beliefs are as that is an exercise in futility.

 

[Tom_in_CA]

The irony for parada would be that you and GoDeep would probably be contacted by a cable TV channel to produce a show.

Sure. I volunteer to the "resident killjoy" in Hollywood. Heck, then I can autograph other people's metal detectors. Right ?

 

[Tom_in_CA]

They aren't mutually exclusive; he can be a liar and still "believe"......

Well, ok. He believes there's treasure, while at the same time being fully aware that the story isn't logically adding up (and altering it to fit things, as he goes along). Thus yes : can hold both states of being, at the same time. Which is a pretty sad state of affairs

 

[GoDeep]

Well, ok. He believes there's treasure, while at the same time being fully aware that the story isn't logically adding up (and altering it to fit things, as he goes along). Thus yes : can hold both states of being, at the same time. Which is a pretty sad state of affairs

Plaintiff reminds me of those crooked TV evangelists who fleeced their followers. Did they really believe in God as they sat at the pulpit lying? Really doesn't matter does it?

Same goes for Plaintiff, it's irrelevant what he believes, we just know he's feeding his flock a lot of lies...

 

[GoDeep]

Plaintiff doing what he does best: Mislead and lies of omission. Plaintiff knows he has no nighttime photos or video as he admitted he doesn't during a "press" conference years ago, saying the FBI must have jammed the cameras at night. But rather than just be straight up and say the truth he says this in response to a question just yesterday:

 

[Tom_in_CA]

Yup. Creating "cliff-hangers".