My prediction.... Craig will have one two years from now....
Yes Joe... I will take it at a discounted price from you.... you are spoiled by the blue viper
My prediction.... Craig will have one two years from now....
Yes Joe... I will take it at a discounted price from you.... you are spoiled by the blue viper
I've stopped paying attention to this thread (well, except to post this).
.......As you should... these guys are going to wait and wait... then wait some more...
.......
You will just have to wait and see....Keep taking the bait Joe... this is so easy
I have serious question now... are you going to tear apart a detector "if it ever comes out" while its under warranty? I sure hope you don't accidentally snip something or worse...
You will just have to wait and see....
Come on "AQ"
Zee.... they already did...... and did a RECALL on all three....AND thats after their testers AND the CEO used one (who found something he didnt like....and he dont hunt as far as i can tell)..... go figure. Getting to be like the Pulse Devil..... it was an exciting machine by what appeared to be a talented designer. I have no doubt it will come out.... but if there are issues like not being able to run 7uS IN the salt water or poor disc..... id kind of like to know that so i can then decide if its still worth that suggested price tag.
Joe..... hopefully you wont have to do that much modification. If you tare it apart (before the Russians do) give us a good shot of it. I can see you doing something about that .... leave it in the truck battery system and headphones, but im not sure about that PP switch and shaft. Ill have to see how nose heavy it is with that large coil. NOW.... if you can get a 9" coil i think you could have an improvement.... UNLESS you loose all that depth.
Last week hunted a beach with a lot of pushed up iron so i grabbed the Xcal. It took some getting used to again. Even it sounded so noisy to me.
I am curious how many TDI Beachhunters are out there - and of that bunch, how many are running “stock” machines - without modified power systems.
The case that the TDIBH is in is actually pretty bad. The very large volume of air in it make it prone to condensation from the greater heat generated by the TDI circuitry, compared to the BHID’s DFX based board. To the best of my knowledge, when Carl Moreland was Chief Engineer at Whites, he passed on the idea of using that case as the basis for a waterproof TDI on grounds of heat generated. His own project for a beach TDI (whatever it was - I have no info on that) never made it to production - likely because Whites has a minuscule R&D budget.
Another issue with the BHID/BHTDI case is that it is not especially rigid, those large flat surfaces deflect easily with pressure. The little tabs which lock the case halves together have a tendency to crack if not very carefully torqued. I had two used ones, they both had cracks in the tabs. Not a great design.
As far as AQ depth compared to other machines, no test video will convince doubters - nor should it. Real shared data will emerge when folks like OBN get theirs and at that point, folks on this forum, recognizing their credibility, will have a basis to make up their minds about the AQ for THEIR “job to be done” - their conditions, their targets and yes - their trash!
Lastly, every detector manufacturer has had issues around the introduction of new machines. Delays (Equinox and Vanquish slow production ramp-up), problems with early unit performance (Garrett, FTP and Whites all have had this happen as far as I can recall), and outright flops like the ML Go-Find are all too common. Taking LOTS of care in introducing a new product is a good idea.