Further documented incidents of possible false statements by Plaintiff:
As has become almost compulsory by Plaintiff, just today Plaintiff knowingly and purposely makes false statements regarding his court case, see attachment below:
1. "The DOJ filed for a 4 month delay" As was discussed in post 365, the DOJ did NOT "file for a 4 month delay in the case" as Plaintiff falsely claims, see here:
https://metaldetectingforum.com/showpost.php?p=3429524&postcount=365
2. "Our court case is on hold until Jan 29th" This is another knowingly untrue statement made just today by Plaintiff as per the latest ruling on 11/7, the judge ordered that the defendants to file their motion by December 21st and Plaintiffs response is ordered to be filed by January 9th so the case is in NO WAY on hold until Jan 29th as Plaintiff falsely claims:
Court Order 11/7/22
ORDER entering the following schedule for further proceedings in this matter: (1) Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment shall be filed on or before December 21, 2022; (2) Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendant's Motion shall be filed on or before January 11, 2023; and (3) Defendant's Reply shall be filed on or before February 1, 2023. Signed by Judge Amit P. Mehta on 11/7/2022. (lcapm1)
3. "WE have the proof to show what the FBI did at Dents Run" I predict time will prove this to be a false statement:
-First, they don't have proof as in actual evidence, just accusations, as if they had actual evidence, it would have been in their motion to compel lead FBI Agent In Charge, Jake Archer, to sit for questioning under penalty of perjury, a motion they lost for lack of evidence. Let that sink in, they lost that motion as
they had no evidence to compel the judge to rule in their favor.
-Second, i predict their claim that they "plan to go public with it" will be another false statement as they've been claiming this for years they are going to "go public" and never do. There's always a "reason" why they can't tell you just yet...Ironic given they accuse the FBI of stalling!