GoDeep
Elite Member
- Joined
- Aug 5, 2022
- Messages
- 756
Thats the mastery of any good con: distraction. He's got his followers debating whether the stories are true or not. If one story doesn't fit, or is proven wrong or the evidence changes, he just moves the goal posts and throws out another story. So far to explain it, he's used the Stolen Civil War Gold Legend, The Spanish, KGC and even Indians and it's came by way of foot, wagon, train and ship!
But it's irrelevant if the legends are true or not. The fact is there is nothing evidentiary tying the dents run site to any legends, wars, thefts, mobs or recluses. The only circumstantial evidence we've ever had is ground scans. Not one ounce of gold has been shown to have been removed from Dents Run, let alone tested to determine its origin. One needs to first establish gold was actually removed from the site, then one can go about having it tested to determine its provenance. Plaintiff conveniently likes to skip that step and get people talking about where it came from to distract from the fact that he's failed to prove any gold was removed from the site.
But it's irrelevant if the legends are true or not. The fact is there is nothing evidentiary tying the dents run site to any legends, wars, thefts, mobs or recluses. The only circumstantial evidence we've ever had is ground scans. Not one ounce of gold has been shown to have been removed from Dents Run, let alone tested to determine its origin. One needs to first establish gold was actually removed from the site, then one can go about having it tested to determine its provenance. Plaintiff conveniently likes to skip that step and get people talking about where it came from to distract from the fact that he's failed to prove any gold was removed from the site.
Last edited: