Coin-Saver
Elite Member
From the Garrett Carrot to the Nokta Banana. What WILL they think of next?
From the Garrett Carrot to the Nokta Banana. What WILL they think of next?
Minelab Mango?From the Garrett Carrot to the Nokta Banana. What WILL they think of next?
He said the following in the comments:I wasn't really impressed with the performance of the "Banana". On the video, it looked like a max of 2". I do like the 360° detection, but the Carrot kills it in depth.
Personally, I think the discrimination on a pinpointer is worthless. If I have decided my detector says I should dig, I don't need my pinpointer to tell me the same thing. I do like the USB charging.
In every pinpointer depth test I've seen, the tester does not test with the coin or ring on edge, like how the ring is on edge in the video. A pinpointer will detect a flat facing coin or ring 2x-3x deeper compared to them being tested on edge."It was a bit rushed for the video to be honest. It was picking up the same ring at about 3 inches during the weekend. I may not have had it well aligned in the video."
In the video, it shows him going into the setting and sensitivity and it is at the default level. Two from the top which looked to be yellow then red and the other levels were green. As in the top two options could overload? Anyway, it was at the default level when he tested the ring, which is much thicker than a coin, at 2". I also have concerns about how easily he pulled the tip off. How long before you start losing the tip in the dirt?He said the following in the comments:
In every pinpointer depth test I've seen, the tester does not test with the coin or ring on edge, like how the ring is on edge in the video. A pinpointer will detect a flat facing coin or ring 2x-3x deeper compared to when they are on edge.
I also have no need for a ferrous discriminating feature, but I was surprised at just how many wanted that feature.
Hmm. I was thinking the red might indicate such a high sensitivity that it might be prone to falsing and/or EMI.In the video, it shows him going into the setting and sensitivity and it is at the default level. Two from the top which looked to be yellow then red and the other levels were green. As in the top two options could overload? Anyway, it was at the default level when he tested the coin at 2".
Sounds possible. I have yet to ever have EMI issues with a pinpointer, but maybe at a really high sensitivity, it could.Hmm. I was thinking the red might indicate such a high sensitivity that it might be prone to falsing and/or EMI.
I'm also wondering if the ferrous discrimination is used, then would some depth be lost on nonferrous targets? For example, as the signal strength decreases on any nonferrous target, it will eventually be identified as ferrous. So, when the ferrous discriminator is activated, a nonferrous target may be ignored if it's at the fringe of detection depth. Although, I suspect the depth loss (if any) would be marginal.
Just goes to show how much one's personal hunting conditions can impact needs. I personally wouldn't consider a pinpointer that doesn't have discrimination. In my environment when I pop open a hole, most of them will also contain iron objects, nails, small bits of highly corroded iron that has been broken apart by the plows, etc. Having discrimination saves me a ton of time knowing which of the 5 detectable targets in the hole are ferrous and non-ferrous.Personally, I think the discrimination on a pinpointer is worthless. If I have decided my detector says I should dig, I don't need my pinpointer to tell me the same thing.
Why would you want to leave the ferrous junk in the same hole you just pulled a nonferrous? There could be more, but it might be masked by the junk now that you have the dirt open. If my detector tells me it is time to recover, I don't need a pinpointer to pick & choose what to leave or take from the hole.Just goes to show how much one's personal hunting conditions can impact needs. I personally wouldn't consider a pinpointer that doesn't have discrimination. In my environment when I pop open a hole, most of them will also contain iron objects, nails, small bits of highly corroded iron that has been broken apart by the plows, etc. Having discrimination saves me a ton of time knowing which of the 5 detectable targets in the hole are ferrous and non-ferrous.
I have found the Profind 35 to have good false-positive characteristics too. E.g. It will sometimes call ferrous as non-ferrous, but it will never say ferrous when it is actually non-ferrous. So I can rely upon it to quickly open up a hole that I am unsure if its an iron-false from some large deep iron, and assess whether I want to keep digging deeper with the pinpointer.
Where I detect, you can always dig down a little deeper and find more and more bits of iron. As you dug out one piece of iron, you would uncover another. You would spend your entire day chasing chunks of ground up iron. For the record these are farm fields that have been in use ever since iron refining made it to the region. If you tried to remove all the iron in a particular location, you wouldn't make it three steps in any direction into the field.Why would you want to leave the ferrous junk in the same hole you just pulled a nonferrous? There could be more, but it might be masked by the junk now that you have the dirt open.
Double score.Score and score more? Is that really the name of a machine?