George (MN)
Elite Member
- Joined
- May 4, 2007
- Messages
- 512
I was shocked to recently read that 30 families own 52% of all land in the US. But in some states, Feds/states claim areas ownership of 95% of land. Seems to indicate more than 100% of area is Fed/state or owned by individuals.
This might possibly indicate that states/Feds are claiming ownership of many areas they really don't own, but might be making deals that they will watch a property for a billionaire, if gov't gets to pretend they are owner, rather than just caretakers, and sets policy. Maximum protection=no trespassing.
If one could get permission from one of these property owners, one could be arrested by a Fed that doesn't own but watches over private property.
Perhaps a good example of this could be Mississippi River National Park. They have painted over the houses, schools, parks & businesses that are within the 1/2 to 1 mile distance each side they want to control near Mississippi River. So far in St. Paul, the Ford plant has been destroyed, also Riverview School. They're saying the new Summit Brewing plant near the Mississippi might have to move. Best wishes, all.
This might possibly indicate that states/Feds are claiming ownership of many areas they really don't own, but might be making deals that they will watch a property for a billionaire, if gov't gets to pretend they are owner, rather than just caretakers, and sets policy. Maximum protection=no trespassing.
If one could get permission from one of these property owners, one could be arrested by a Fed that doesn't own but watches over private property.
Perhaps a good example of this could be Mississippi River National Park. They have painted over the houses, schools, parks & businesses that are within the 1/2 to 1 mile distance each side they want to control near Mississippi River. So far in St. Paul, the Ford plant has been destroyed, also Riverview School. They're saying the new Summit Brewing plant near the Mississippi might have to move. Best wishes, all.