Wood-butcher, here's your mistake : You haven't acknowledged that the Nox 800 cures cancer. You haven't acknowledged that the 800 (assuming in the hands-of-equally proficient/experienced users) won't "spank everything else.".
And your lack of acknowledgement of these "facts" (that we assume out-the-starting-gate) means you are : Mean-spirited, argumentative, "have a grudge", are "critical", etc..... Right ?
Notice if you'd have come to the opposite conclusion, then presto, you'd have been granted these labels : Nice spirited, conciliatory/correct , no grudges, and open-minded.
So it's not a question of your test data. Instead, it's a question/accusation of your biases, mean-ness, etc.... So you need to repent and get on-board. Otherwise .... you have nothing to say to this conversation. Eh ?
I hope everyone knows this is tongue in cheek. To see how "labels" get bandied about. Labels that simply "assume someone's point-of-view, from the git-go, as proof-of-it".
I don't doubt that the Nox is a good machine. But when the proponents started rolling out the posts (starting with the introduction 1 to 2 yrs. ago) that it "spanked all others", then .... how can you blame someone for desiring to un-ravel the claims ? I mean, gee, which one of us DOESN'T want the "best mousetrap" ? And if you fail to come up with the proponent's data, are you *automatically* smeered with all the labels ?
Sheesk guys, stop with the names. MD'ing forums are for the EXPRESS purpose of comparing new tech, testing, etc.... It doesn't mean that someone who comes to a diverse opinion "has a grudge", etc....