YooperBSN
Senior Member
So I read the CRH 101 thread and I understand the basic premise of CRHing. Obviously, the goal is to examine volume to increase chances of a good find. I also get that one can CRH with a variety of purposes; errors, rares/keys, varieties, silver, etc. This said, is it worth the time, effort, and resources to keep coins with "garden variety" errors like machine doubling, push doubling, die deterioration doubling, cuds, die cracks, die clash, broad strikes, grease-filled strikes, etc? Obviously if the variety is an extreme example it may be worth something... for example, I found a 2015 dime with die deterioration doubling but the separation in the doubling is rather noticable. On the other hand, using a loupe I've found other examples of doubling that could not bee seen otherwise. I guess I'm trying to gauge the cost/benefit ratio of various approaches to CRHing...